|
By Michael Cork Should a judge be able to tell a convicted rapist how to manage his sexual life?  Michael Cork Should a judge be able to tell a convicted rapist how to manage his sexual life? That’s the question being asked about a case in a small town in southern Idaho.
Last fall, Idaho Twin Falls County Judge Randy Stoker gave rape defendant, Cody Duane Scott Herrera, the option of completing an education and rehabilitation program or going to prison. And the judge noted that if Herrera completes the program and is granted probation, “a condition of [probation] will be you will not have sexual relations with anyone except who you’re married to, if you’re married.” Herrera is single.
0 Comments
By Curt Smith for the Indianapolis Business Journal print and online edition for Feb 11, 2017. https://www.ibj.com/articles/62404-indianarsquos-part-in-the-supreme-court-dance 
Next, Trump selected our governor, Mike Pence, as his running mate in July, just before the GOP convention in Cleveland, thereby locking in their win. Now comes the first truly titanic fight of the new Trump/Pence administration: Indiana will be at the center of this battle to confirm a new U.S. Supreme Court justice. That’s because Indiana’s U.S. Sen. Joe Donnelly is among the handful of possible “persuadable” Democrats in the upper chamber. Donnelly will be an intense target of President Trump and Vice President Pence as they seek to fill the seat held by the late Justice Antonin Scalia. The stakes for Donnelly could not be higher. He finds himself in the political crosshair of the first major debate and struggle of the Trump/Pence administration as he prepares his own re-election bid for 2018. So Hoosiers will also have a front-row seat and, potentially again, an outsized role in this political process. These battles are intense. Both as a U.S. Senate staff member and the leader of a policy advocacy organization, I have played small roles in mobilizing public opinion and educating my fellow citizens on potential nominees over the years. The Robert Bork hearings were the worst (there is a reason “Bork” is now a verb in American politics) and the Clarence Thomas hearings the most unsettling. The David Souter confirmation was the most disappointing. But this fight over the nomination of federal Appeals Court Judge Neil Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Court might be the most intriguing. That is because his confirmation in a closely divided Senate (the partisan split is 52 Republicans and effectively 48 Democrats) might require a change in Senate rules, the so-called nuclear option. Former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, changed the rules to benefit President Obama for executive branch appointments, except Supreme Court nominees. Now Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, faces a tough call on changing Senate rules again to facilitate Gorsuch’s elevation to the Supreme Court. There will be much talk about the Senate’s role and traditions in American public life, but this will come down to politics. And that’s why it will be so fascinating. Here’s my prediction, so I can eat political crow later. Donnelly and a handful of other senators facing tough re-election races in red states carried by Trump and Pence will agree to forgo a filibuster, making many speeches about the need to preserve the Senate’s consensus-making role and its (my view) faded status as the world’s greatest deliberative body. If correct, this means Donnelly will vote for cloture, which requires 60 votes, to shut off a filibuster and allow a confirmation vote. Then Donnelly will vote against Gorsuch, to try to have it both ways. He can say he did not block the Trump/Pence administration, yet voted against this particular judge. Gorsuch would then win a simple majority vote and begin serving on the high court. We’ll see if this happens and, if so, whether Hoosiers are fooled. Fascinating times, indeed.• Curt Smith is represented by the PumpJack.me Speakers Bureau. Learn more here or email Curt.Smith@PumpJack.me.
|
Archives
May 2018
Categories
All
|
RSS Feed